Friday, August 24, 2007

Stark Contrasts? The Gospel and the Privileged





Is there hope for the privileged?

Sometimes you hear that the privileged and educated are not open to the gospel. It is almost a truism in some circles that open people are poor, less educated, and rural. When you look around the areas of the world where there are populations of new believers, that mostly appears to be the case. Philip Jenkins, author of The Next Christendom, goes so far as to say that: “By 2050… [the world’s average Christian] …is above all likely to be an extremely poor person...” (1)

Some have been relating to sections of the world’s middle and upper classes for decades without seeing a single person coming to faith in Christ, and few continuing in their faith. This is no small matter since for example in India the upper and middle class is possibly 300 million people strong (roughly the same as the entire population of the United States.)


Some encouragement from the early church.

I’ve recently been reading a book called The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal, Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries by Rodney Stark. Reading Stark’s study of the early church has encouraged me to harbor hope for the urban privileged and educated. The overall thrust of the Bible certainly has a special concern for the poor, but it also states that God loves the whole world. There are instances of God redeeming rulers, priests, tax-collectors, and apparently large privileged urban populations.

Stark argues that a consensus has developed among New Testament historians that the early church was not mainly made up of the poor and uneducated, but rather the early church was based in the middle and upper classes, was relatively privileged, educated and highly urban. He also notes that statistically there is no reason to believe there were any rapid mass movements to the faith happening. The numbers could have been extremely small in the early years and with only very modest growth rate could have reached half the population of the Roman Empire by the middle of the fourth century. Both of these points encouraged me that those relating to the educated middle classes of the world are not wasting their time. And even if there are only small handfuls of Christ-followers in the early decades, this is not very different from how things went in a movement that changed a whole civilization. We needn’t write off the world’s cities, educated and privileged. They seemed to have been on God’s heart in significant ways in the history of His people.


-Sdawg

(This was a guest post authorized by the Swooping Crane.)


NOTES

1. “Companions of Life” [http://www.christianvisionproject.com/2007/03/companions_of_life.html]

6 comments:

M Crane said...

Great post! This does provide encouragement for those who have seen very little fruit in their contexts. It does put the pressure on to start right, with a strong foundation. There have been many movements that start with a burst, but fizzle and disappear completely.

Regarding the quote from P. Jenkins about the global church becoming increasingly impoverished, the optimist in me hopes that the transformational nature of following Jesus will have an impact on people’s socioeconomic standing. I also hope that the global church can kick in and share their resources with those that most need it (in a way that is healthy and promotes self-sustainability of course).

sdawg said...

I really do wonder about some of the rapid cpm's we here about in different places. How much is really going on. Are people becoming disciples? How many of them are actually continuing in the faith?

sdawg said...

With regard to the socioeconomic standing: I've begun to question more and more some of the thinking in things like "Underdevelopment is a State of Mind" and such. If you go to transparency international, its not the nations with the least corruption that are always the most economically robust. But the optimist would hope that, all things being equal, spiritual transformation also leads to economic transformation. But all things are rarely equal.

Wendy said...

i haven't read stark's book. how do his ideas intersect with/support/undermine, andrew walls' theory of the serial nature of christianity?

(and you thought that i was just joking about being in seminary, michael :)

sdawg said...

Can you give a brief account of Walls' idea of the serial nature?

s&j said...

I'm almost done with Sachs' "End of Poverty." He makes some strong arguments against simply social and moral changes getting the job done with regard to economic uplift.